Last post we learned that kinesiophobia (fear of movement) is bad, especially if an athlete exhibits kinesiophobia when returning to sport following an ACL reconstruction. According to the Paterno et al Sport Health 2018 athletes who score 19 or above on the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, they are 13xs more likely to reinjure themselves with return to play. For those of us that have treated ACL patients, this is nothing new, but we now have better ways of assessing it. Rather than just being something we see anecdotally in our athlete, we now have tools, like the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, where we can objectively measure this.
Still, measuring kinesiophobia is one thing. What you do with that information is something entirely different.
One thing that can lead to increased kinesiophobia is an athlete’s lack of sport locus of control. Sport Locus of Control is the athlete’s feeling or perception that they are in control of their destiny. For most athletes, throughout their athletic career, they have been in charge of their athletic destiny. How hard they trained, their personal effort they put forth, how they performed as an individual or as a part of a team was determined by them.
However, once an athlete has an injury, their sport locus of control is passed onto someone else (often for the first time in their athletic career). It’s the orthopedic surgeon who tells them when they can take the brace off, start running or return to play that has some if this control. It’s the physical therapist or athletic trainer who tells them what exercise they can and can’t do, how they will progress with running or sport specific activities, that now has some of this control. So, for the first time, the athlete is dependent on others for their sport locus of control and for their sports destiny.
For many, this can have big psychological impact. With that loss of control over one’s destiny comes fear. Ardern et al Am J Sports Med 2103 showed that sport locus of control was one of the indicators that determined an athlete’s successful return to play. Therefore, it is up to us to make sure the first thing we do is we give that back to the athlete.
Well that sounds easy, but how do we do that? There are a couple ways we can approach this: One is from what we say and one is from what we do.
It starts in the very first session. I am often quoted as saying:
“I am simply an educator and a coach. I will educate you about your injury, what the process is, what you should expect and how we will progress you for return to play. I will coach you along the process, telling you what to do, how to do it and push you hard. BUT at the end of the day it is up to you to make it happen. This is not easy. There will be challenges, which we will overcome. You have to want it. It will define you as an athlete. But you can do it. You will do it and we will do it together. You will come out of this faster, stronger and a better and more rounded athlete. Are you ready and willing to make that happen?”
In that short 2 1/2 minute discussion, I have passed the sport locus of control to the athlete.
Psychologically, what was also done? Two things:
- I gave the athlete confidence in me as the clinician. Gaining the athlete’s confidence in you as a provider is critical to their success.
- I gave the athlete confidence in themselves. Confidence that they can do this, that they are in control and will determine their own destiny.
This immediate first step is critical to setting the pace for the entire rehab process and critical to building the patient’s confidence. The next thing we need to do early in the rehab process is start to build confidence in their ability to return to play. Part of this is the conversation we just had and the other part is actually performing activities that provide you confidence that you can go the next level.
We might assume this would be common knowledge, but we find this is not as common as we might think. A recent case highlights this:
19 y/o female division I soccer player who is 5 months post op R ACLR. She has been receiving “accelerated” rehab in an aggressive sport specific training center. She is being assessed for return to sport specific training. We are engaged by the team to do our movement assessments which is an aggressive movement assessment (ViPerform AMI) using 3D wearable sensors.
This test consists of:
- 1 minute Plank test
- Squat test
- 1 minute side plank right then left
- Single Limb tests all on right first then the left
- Single leg squat
- Single leg hop
- Single leg hop plant (multidirectional hop)
- Ankle lunge test
At the 5-month mark, most s/p ACLR should be able to perform the test. Part of the pre-requisites for the test is that the athlete must have performed each of the movements safely in the clinic prior to testing. When asked to do a single leg squat, you could visibly see the athlete was hesitant to perform, but she did and did so safely. When asked to perform a single leg hop, the athlete’s hesitancy increased, she started sweating profusely and began to feel lightheaded. This is an extreme case of kinesiophobia!
But why did she have this kind of response?
We are going to dive into this case in some detail in the next post – specifically how we can avoid this with our athletes – and we’ll continue to discuss how the way we evaluate can impact kinesiophobia and add additional scales we can use for return to play.
For more info on products mentioned in this article or for info on current product specials, please contact your personal MeyerDC Account Manager.
If you don’t know who your Account Manager is, please call 800.472.4221 to find out.